People have some weird logic that confuses me?

Hello



I have come across a very big problem when it comes to people's ability to use logic.



Say for instance; I had several people that broke into my house, and I obviously wanted to make my house very secure. It was really unusual in that these break in happened to me quite a few times and it had happened to no one else.

I may tell people about it after not being able to prove that my house was broken into 7 times, and they will often say that I am paranoid because I want so much security.

I could try convincing them that people have broken into the house this many times, but I wouldn't be very successful at it; and I could try collecting evidence to prove that this happened, but I may be very bad at it.

But these people that would say that I was paranoid in this situation, since they are never there was witness the break-ins, I can't understand how they can determine that I was paranoid without considering the possibility that I am not. Unless they can prove that there was a never a break-in or that there was not more than one; they are not in a position to make any conclusion other than what is more likely to be true.

These breaks in this case are hypothetical.



People cannot base how they interact with people on what is only likely to be true if there is a risk that it could adversely affect people in the process; not unless there is a risk for doing so that they have to wieghed up against it. This is also the principal for which science is based on.

So what is going on in their heads to make them reason things in this strange way? Is it brain damage? Is it their intension to be negligent? Explain it because this behaviour baffles me completely.



CREEDPeople have some weird logic that confuses me?
They just can't believe you still live there if this kept happening.



Most people would have moved, not just put in more security.



Good Luck!